Integrated Multi-Endpoint Clinical Evaluation
Rationale
Daily blue-light exposure and environmental stressors impair the skin’s mechanical behaviour—lower elasticity, higher deformation—and slow down stratum corneum turnover, disrupting circadian-regulated renewal.
Study Design
A 28-day multi-endpoint clinical evaluation performed on outdoor workers (35–65 y/o; all endpoints were collected on the same volunteer panel). A cream containing 5% APPLEguard® was compared with placebo under two standardized protocols:
-
half-face application for biomechanical parameters (elastic recovery R2, firmness under load F4)
-
forearm application for renewal efficiency (SCTT, DHA–ITA° kinetics)
- Elasticity & Firmness Improvement (Cutometer® R2, F4)
Model
Cutometer® measurements of elastic recovery (R2) and deformation under load (F4) after 28 days of half-face application.
Outcome
APPLEguard® improved elastic recovery (+7.8%) and reduced deformation under stress (F4: –23.5% vs T0 and vs placebo).
Meaning
Improved mechanical behaviour indicates better structural efficiency and resistance to stress-related fatigue, consistent with circadian-supported recovery.
Taken together, these findings establish a robust, multi-dimensional efficacy profile for APPLEguard®, spanning cellular protection, mechanical performance, renewal dynamics and perceived benefits.